Test grouping/folder feature (2-x layers) which have also the select/deselect "all tests below" function to get a better overview in complex test scenarios.
The new lock for actions is well done and a great improvement. We need the exact same thing for the test themselves. I have many test files with huge lists and the same issue that causes them to loose there order because of the drag and drop functionality. Please add the same lock that is on items to tests.
Since many workflows are started automatically, it would be helpful In the UserApp connector if there was a way to get a list of workflow approvals pending for a particular user. This would allow us to know if the workflow was automatically started correctly.
Replay test(s) n number of times
Allow looping over values in a variable.
Implement LDAP query function and store the query result in a multi-valued variable.
- Allow the stored format to be JSON, delimited text, xml.
- Allow max number of results to be variable (1...1000 or more)
The addition of a LDAP login is nice. It would be helpful if the users did not need DN. I think the way to do this is a bind user that could search for the user context.
Adding extra logic into the test cases depending on the value of a variable.
There are test suites that show off the various connectors. However, each driver NetIQ ships should have an Add On Package that has a DirXML-Resource with a text/json or maybe json/validator DirXML-ContentType that stores the test suite, Then just as you can read the connectors out of the IDV, also look for DirXMl-Resources whose DirXML-ContentType is validator/json and read them back and import the test suite. Buffer ...more »
Get the QA team that validates drivers for each release to use Validator, and release the basic set of tests that exersize the driver completely.
It should be possible to host Validator as a shared, central web-service,
but this requires a proper user athentication and authorisation, e.g. via LDAP or SAML.
We have a case, where we have Sendmail objects that have an attribute, serialNumber, we can query on via LDAP. This would return a list of 1-N objects back. I do not think we can do multivalued local variables, nor loop over them, but we need to 1) Ensure they are all deleted. 2) Ensure that at least 1 or more are created. This seems like a new assertion of LDAP Filter returns, with sub options of: 0-n values ...more »